diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index fd85fed3..c6c86809 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -27,13 +27,11 @@ Changes:
 *   Fix: `StructuralAttack` now respects the `report_individual` flag. Per-record
     `record_level_results` and `attack_metrics["individual"]` are only populated when the
     flag is set to `True`, matching the behaviour of `LIRAAttack` and `QMIAAttack`.
-*   Breaking: `LIRAAttack` per-record output field renamed from `"score"` to
-    `"member_prob"` to standardise with `QMIAAttack` and `WorstCaseAttack`. Affects
-    the `individual` dict in `attack_metrics`, the `report.json` payload, and the
-    externalised `.npz` sidecar key (`individual.score` becomes
-    `individual.member_prob`). Existing LiRA `report.json` files written before this
-    release will not be readable by `MetaAttack`'s `use_existing_only` mode and
-    should be regenerated.
+*   Feat: `WorstCaseAttack` now accepts a `report_individual` flag. When enabled, each
+    repetition's metrics dict gains an `"individual"` key holding per-record
+    `"member_prob"` (the attack classifier's membership probability) and `"member"`
+    (the ground truth label), matching the per-record output convention used by
+    `LIRAAttack` and `QMIAAttack`. Arrays are sized to the attack-model test slice.
 
 ## Version 1.4.3 (Jan 29, 2026)
 
diff --git a/sacroml/attacks/worst_case_attack.py b/sacroml/attacks/worst_case_attack.py
index 119325a4..6e77d32b 100644
--- a/sacroml/attacks/worst_case_attack.py
+++ b/sacroml/attacks/worst_case_attack.py
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ def __init__(
         search_type: str = "grid",
         search_n_iter: int = 10,
         tuning_metric: str | Callable = "AUC",
+        report_individual: bool = False,
     ) -> None:
         """Construct an object to execute a worst case attack.
 
@@ -135,6 +136,14 @@ def __init__(
             :data:`sacroml.attacks._scorers.SCORERS`, any sklearn scoring
             string, or a custom callable following the sklearn
             ``(estimator, X, y)`` protocol.
+        report_individual : bool
+            Whether to expose per-record membership probabilities in the
+            output. When True, each repetition's metrics dict gains an
+            ``"individual"`` key holding ``"member_prob"`` (the attack
+            classifier's probability of membership for each test sample)
+            and ``"member"`` (the ground truth label). The arrays are
+            sized to the attack-model test slice, not the full target
+            training set.
         """
         super().__init__(output_dir=output_dir, write_report=write_report)
         self.n_reps: int = n_reps
@@ -167,6 +176,7 @@ def __init__(
             )
             self.tuning_metric = "AUC"
             self._resolved_tuning_scorer = resolve_scorer("AUC")
+        self.report_individual: bool = report_individual
         self.dummy_attack_metrics: list = []
         self._tuned_params: dict | None = None
         self._tuning_info: dict | None = None
@@ -547,6 +557,12 @@ def run_attack_reps(
             y_pred_proba = attack_classifier.predict_proba(mi_test_x)
             mia_metrics.append(metrics.get_metrics(y_pred_proba, mi_test_y))
 
+            if self.report_individual:
+                mia_metrics[-1]["individual"] = {
+                    "member_prob": y_pred_proba[:, 1].tolist(),
+                    "member": np.asarray(mi_test_y).tolist(),
+                }
+
             if self.include_model_correct_feature and train_correct is not None:
                 # Compute the Yeom TPR and FPR
                 yeom_preds = mi_test_x[:, -1]
diff --git a/tests/attacks/test_worst_case_attack.py b/tests/attacks/test_worst_case_attack.py
index d6229a77..2ac1c09b 100644
--- a/tests/attacks/test_worst_case_attack.py
+++ b/tests/attacks/test_worst_case_attack.py
@@ -358,3 +358,49 @@ def test_no_tuning_leaves_metadata_clean(common_setup):
     assert "tuning" not in output["metadata"]
     assert attack_obj._tuned_params is None
     assert attack_obj._tuning_info is None
+
+
+def test_wc_report_individual_default_off_omits_individual(common_setup):
+    """Default report_individual=False: per-rep dicts have no "individual" key."""
+    target = common_setup
+    attack_obj = worst_case_attack.WorstCaseAttack(
+        n_reps=2,
+        n_dummy_reps=0,
+        p_thresh=0.05,
+        test_prop=0.5,
+        output_dir="test_output_worstcase",
+    )
+    assert attack_obj.report_individual is False
+
+    output = attack_obj.attack(target)
+    instances = output["attack_experiment_logger"]["attack_instance_logger"]
+    for inst in instances.values():
+        assert "individual" not in inst
+
+
+def test_wc_report_individual_on_populates_per_rep_member_prob(common_setup):
+    """Report_individual=True populates per-rep individual member_prob and member."""
+    target = common_setup
+    attack_obj = worst_case_attack.WorstCaseAttack(
+        n_reps=2,
+        n_dummy_reps=0,
+        p_thresh=0.05,
+        test_prop=0.5,
+        output_dir="test_output_worstcase",
+        report_individual=True,
+    )
+
+    output = attack_obj.attack(target)
+    instances = output["attack_experiment_logger"]["attack_instance_logger"]
+    assert len(instances) == 2
+
+    for inst in instances.values():
+        assert "individual" in inst
+        ind = inst["individual"]
+        assert set(ind.keys()) == {"member_prob", "member"}
+        assert len(ind["member_prob"]) == len(ind["member"])
+        assert len(ind["member_prob"]) > 0
+        for prob in ind["member_prob"]:
+            assert 0.0 <= prob <= 1.0
+        for label in ind["member"]:
+            assert label in (0, 1)