Problem
privacy.rs has broad dead-code allowances that may be stale now that privacy helpers are used by the assembler.
Evidence
- privacy.rs (line 1) has
#![allow(dead_code)], and line 47 (line 47) has another #[allow(dead_code)]. The privacy helpers are now used by the LLM assembler, so these suppressions look stale.
Scope & constraints
No response
Proposed approach
Remove global #![allow(dead_code)] and keep only targeted allowances if needed.
Acceptance criteria
- No unnecessary allow-lints.
- Compiler warnings reveal real dead code.
Test plan
cargo clippy / preflight.
Problem
privacy.rshas broad dead-code allowances that may be stale now that privacy helpers are used by the assembler.Evidence
#![allow(dead_code)], and line 47 (line 47) has another#[allow(dead_code)]. The privacy helpers are now used by the LLM assembler, so these suppressions look stale.Scope & constraints
No response
Proposed approach
Remove global
#![allow(dead_code)]and keep only targeted allowances if needed.Acceptance criteria
Test plan
cargo clippy/ preflight.