You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Found during the 2026-06-10 overnight conductor-demo rehearsal (isolated gateway, LM Studio).
Evidence
The lmstudio/openai-compat provider path injects ALL tool schemas as prompt text ('You have access to the following functions: {…}') instead of the native tools API field. A 119-tool turn ships a ~43k-token prompt (LM Studio rejected with n_keep 43019 vs n_ctx 4096 until the model was reloaded at 64k).
Under the execution-worker job prompt, both gemma-4-12b and qwen3.6-35b-a3b narrate intent and emit malformed pseudo-calls ('<|tool_call>call:tasks.search{…}', '[ tasks: list, status: open ]') that never execute → no board change → runs auto-block after maxNoProgressAttempts. A plain foreground chat turn on the same model DID parse a correct call, so the format-following is prompt-sensitive.
Worker mechanics verified fine end-to-end with the same template (cycle picks up task, simulate-mode external-tool policy enforced, governance metadata recorded) — the failure is purely the tool-call channel on local providers.
Asks
Use native tool-calling (OpenAI 'tools' field) for lmstudio/ollama/openai-compatible providers where the server supports it (LM Studio does).
Found during the 2026-06-10 overnight conductor-demo rehearsal (isolated gateway, LM Studio).
Evidence
Asks
Related: #407, #423 (silent tool-skip class). Demo kit: scripts/demo/conductor-demo.mjs (PR #441).