Problem statement
The ingestion of the data and the creation of the wiki sometimes fails due to lack of knowledge. There’s a lack of context when creating the embeddings and when extracting the information for the wiki.
Proposed solution
From what I’ve seen, this could improve by having a seed document for each chat. For instance, for the company, it would be the definition protocols and a definition of who is who.
That way, the wiki would produce better results and more real concepts. I’ve been modifying it, and so far what I did in my version was exactly that: creating the notion of the seed document and having it ingest the seed document when doing both tasks:
- creating the wiki
- ingesting the data
This greatly improved the outcome. So perhaps an onboard procedure where we can define the background context and vocabulary of a group, and I would also propose having a bigger classification, I use family, work, projects, and this makes also a group of chats collaborate into the same wiki , and use the same seed document.
I use AI to code, so not sure if I should do a PR.
Alternatives considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Problem statement
The ingestion of the data and the creation of the wiki sometimes fails due to lack of knowledge. There’s a lack of context when creating the embeddings and when extracting the information for the wiki.
Proposed solution
From what I’ve seen, this could improve by having a seed document for each chat. For instance, for the company, it would be the definition protocols and a definition of who is who.
That way, the wiki would produce better results and more real concepts. I’ve been modifying it, and so far what I did in my version was exactly that: creating the notion of the seed document and having it ingest the seed document when doing both tasks:
This greatly improved the outcome. So perhaps an onboard procedure where we can define the background context and vocabulary of a group, and I would also propose having a bigger classification, I use family, work, projects, and this makes also a group of chats collaborate into the same wiki , and use the same seed document.
I use AI to code, so not sure if I should do a PR.
Alternatives considered
No response
Additional context
No response