Ledger is looking for one community archivist or mutual-aid steward to review a synthetic, local-only workflow. This is not a request for real records, a production deployment, security certification, or an endorsement.\n\nThe review is scoped to 60–90 minutes and asks: is the preservation + selective-disclosure flow understandable, are the operational adoption conditions honest, and what would need to change before a supervised future pilot?\n\nPlease use only synthetic data and do not post sensitive archive information. The full protocol, invitation wording, and consent-aware report template are in the community-archivist pilot packet, proposed in #98.\n\nIf you might be interested, please comment with only the contact method you are comfortable making public, or use the project contact route in the profile. Feedback can remain private and attribution is opt-in.
Ledger is looking for one community archivist or mutual-aid steward to review a synthetic, local-only workflow. This is not a request for real records, a production deployment, security certification, or an endorsement.\n\nThe review is scoped to 60–90 minutes and asks: is the preservation + selective-disclosure flow understandable, are the operational adoption conditions honest, and what would need to change before a supervised future pilot?\n\nPlease use only synthetic data and do not post sensitive archive information. The full protocol, invitation wording, and consent-aware report template are in the community-archivist pilot packet, proposed in #98.\n\nIf you might be interested, please comment with only the contact method you are comfortable making public, or use the project contact route in the profile. Feedback can remain private and attribution is opt-in.