Replies: 6 comments 2 replies
-
|
Additional note. This doubles as a bug. I knew there was an update available for changedetection.io. When I ran the scan, I got an email that a new container was available, but no pushover notification AND no update available showing in the containers view or updates available widget on the dashboard. Also the email notification was incomplete. See below: No hostname or tag info |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the detailed report — rc.13 has fixes for two of the three things here. 1. "Updating" during a scan → now "Scanning" 2. No Pushover notification on scan-triggered updates → fixed 3. Incomplete email body ( Will post again when rc.13 is tagged. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Please see the following video on triggering a scan for a single container. The "scanning" spinner is showing after we trigger the container but is completely disconnected from the container that triggered it. Then eventually the notification comes up indicating the scan had started for the given container. I would recommend showing the scanning state at the container/row level so it stays with the container that is scanning. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15-ZmPy1cEWyHt2sRoxb8Na9A-hpTh-MW/view?usp=sharing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Quick status — rc.15 ships two fixes here:
If your recording was against a build before rc.15, please retest once v1.5.0 lands (going out shortly) — the chip should now stay locked to the container actually being scanned. For the incomplete email body (blank hostname/tag) — could you confirm whether that still reproduces on rc.15? If yes, an example of the rendered email + the SMTP trigger config would help us track it down separately. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Quick follow-up — after rewatching your video closely I spotted a third bug we hadn't accounted for. The chip floating in the row gutter (separate from the wrong-row anchoring issue) is a CSS positioning bug: the overlay chip is absolutely-positioned and depends on a containing block on the row, which scanning rows weren't getting (the mechanism was tied to the update-lock state, which scan deliberately doesn't trigger). Without that anchor the chip escaped the table layout and rendered in viewport-fixed coordinates — exactly the gutter-float you captured. Just landed the fix in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Verified this locally on the current rc branch. Single-container scans now show Scanning on the same row, not Updating, stay anchored during scroll in desktop and narrow views, and the bulk scan path still dispatches correctly. Closing this as fixed for v1.5.0. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When running a scan on a single container I see "updating" as the state. This seems in accurate to me. Feels like the display should be "scanning" to better match what the container is doing at the time.
See video below:
Screen.Recording.2026-04-20.at.11.20.31.AM.mov
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions