Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I had a similar experience and opend following issue for it #391 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the report (and the cross-reference to #391). There are two distinct cases worth separating: Pull failure (the new image couldn't be downloaded) — the container already returns to the update-available list on the next watch cycle. No change needed there. Replacement failure (the image pulled, but recreating the container failed — e.g. the pulled image isn't available for your host's CPU architecture) — this was the case in #391 where the old container could be lost. That's now fixed for the next release candidate (v1.5.0-rc.29):
So a container that fails to update stays running on its current version and remains visible as update-available, instead of disappearing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Current behavior as of rc.26 seems to be if a container update fails it doesn't return to the update available list so the user is unabl to try again. If my assumptions are correct, please consider changing this behavior. Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions