Skip to content

Avoid (Ontological) Weasel Words in Definitions (unnecessary phrases or clauses that merely suggest a boundary) #218

@jonathanvajda

Description

@jonathanvajda

I had conversation with the CUBRC team offline, but I was told to make this request public.

Definitions should avoid examples and intentionally vague language. This isn't an inviolable rule, but one we can avoid in a mid-level ontology. There are cagey words that give wiggle room, and we can avoid them. Terms and phrases like:

  • example
  • such as
  • in other words
  • for illustration
  • for instance
  • typical*
  • usual*
  • mostly
  • often

Examples are supposed to be annotated with cco:example_of_usage
Elucidations are supposed to be annotated with cco:elucidation

For the mid-level ontologies, here's what my QC SPARQL query pulled:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions