Skip to content

force conflict resolutions? #40

@ctc3d

Description

@ctc3d

The real problem here is with the various authorities and has a lot to do with my particular use-case, but TCR probably needs a way to deal with it.

I'm running resolve_sci_taxa() using ITIS and GBIF; some data sets specify a lot of sub-species data like hybrids and cultivars. GBIF seems more willing to recognize those than ITIS but also more likely to alter the form of the taxon:
Abies balsamea var phanerolepis -> Abies balsamea phanerolepis
Acer x freemanii -> Acer freemanii

After going through TCR my next step involves matching the approved taxa from taxa_map$taxa_clean to yet another authority's species list. For cases where the third authority doesn't match the taxa_clean version, replace_taxa() does no good because the term in taxa_replacement is going to get reconstrued in taxa_clean or go unrecognized.

The best solution might be a function like replace_taxa() that injects its output parameter into taxa_clean rather than taxa_replacement, with suitable changes to the authority-related fields.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions