Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 17, 2020. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 17, 2020. It is now read-only.

Closed vocabulary for field values? #7

@JohnMrziglod

Description

@JohnMrziglod

Which of the field values in the B2Find metadata defintion need to be restricted by a closed vocabulary? For some fields, contrary to free text, a more closed vocabulary would be suitable, since less options look better in terms of representation of facets.

Fields that could be assigned a closed vocabulary:

  • discipline (choose from predefined list)
  • language (use predefined set)
  • format (mime type could be argued)
  • country (the current definition could be more restricted)

Note: the fields regarding temporal information and coordinates could be excluded from the definition, since these already have to conform to strict rules.

Reporter: Kees Jan

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions