Which part of our software stack is concerned by the feature ?
Chutney
Describe your use case
Currently, the chutney-server and chutney-demo Docker images published to GHCR are built only for the default GitHub Actions runner architecture (linux/amd64).
As a result, users running on ARM platforms (e.g., Apple Silicon, ARM-based servers) encounter the following error when pulling the image:
no matching manifest for linux/arm64/v8 in the manifest list entries
Is your feature request related to a problem ?
No response
Describe the solution you'd like
To improve compatibility, we should publish multi-architecture Docker images (manifest lists) so that a single tag automatically works for both:
This will allow users to pull the image without specifying --platform.
Link to examples
No response
Which part of our software stack is concerned by the feature ?
Chutney
Describe your use case
Currently, the chutney-server and chutney-demo Docker images published to GHCR are built only for the default GitHub Actions runner architecture (linux/amd64).
As a result, users running on ARM platforms (e.g., Apple Silicon, ARM-based servers) encounter the following error when pulling the image:
no matching manifest for linux/arm64/v8 in the manifest list entriesIs your feature request related to a problem ?
No response
Describe the solution you'd like
To improve compatibility, we should publish multi-architecture Docker images (manifest lists) so that a single tag automatically works for both:
This will allow users to pull the image without specifying --platform.
Link to examples
No response