您好，请问方便提供一下三个数据集的来源吗？急需，若能提供非常感谢~

[FinnCarmen]

您好，请问方便提供一下三个数据集的来源吗？yelp是SELFRec上的吗？似乎SELFRec没有提供社交信息？请问是具体哪个版本呀？若能提供会引用这篇论文的

[EnjunDu]

Hi

All three datasets we use are consistent with those provided by RecBole. The Yelp dataset is from RecBole (not directly from SELFRec), since SELFRec does not include social network information for Yelp.

You can find the dataset details in the RecBole paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 and https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511808.3557680

Thanks for considering citing our work!

[FinnCarmen]

Hi

All three datasets we use are consistent with those provided by RecBole. The Yelp dataset is from RecBole (not directly from SELFRec), since SELFRec does not include social network information for Yelp.

You can find the dataset details in the RecBole paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 and https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511808.3557680

Thanks for considering citing our work!

您好， https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 这篇论文写的yelp的用户数为1,968,703，也没有社交信息，和DSVC中的45 919不一样，方便提供一下对应yelp的链接吗，我好像没有在RecBole找到

[EnjunDu]

Hi
All three datasets we use are consistent with those provided by RecBole. The Yelp dataset is from RecBole (not directly from SELFRec), since SELFRec does not include social network information for Yelp.
You can find the dataset details in the RecBole paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 and https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511808.3557680
Thanks for considering citing our work!

您好， https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 这篇论文写的yelp的用户数为1,968,703，也没有社交信息，和DSVC中的45 919不一样，方便提供一下对应yelp的链接吗，我好像没有在RecBole找到

Hi, thank you very much for the careful check and for pointing this out.

I have consulted with the first author. Since this work was conducted around 2023, we are unfortunately no longer able to precisely trace back the original source or download link of the Yelp dataset used at that time. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

What we can confirm is that the Yelp dataset we used does include social network information, which is why its scale (e.g., 45,919 users) differs from the Yelp dataset described in the RecBole paper you mentioned, which does not contain social data.

For reproducibility, we recommend either using the Yelp data provided in our repository (which matches our experimental setup), or constructing/using another Yelp variant with social information.

Thank you again for your understanding and for your interest in citing our work. Please feel free to reach out if you have further questions.

[FinnCarmen]

ok，thanks | | grfpas | | ***@***.*** | ---- 回复的原邮件 ---- | 发件人 | Enjun ***@***.***> | | 发送日期 | 2026年2月3日 22:47 | | 收件人 | ***@***.***> | | 抄送人 | ***@***.***>, ***@***.***> | | 主题 | Re: [EnjunDu/DSVC] 您好，请问方便提供一下三个数据集的来源吗？急需，若能提供非常感谢~ (Issue #1) | EnjunDu left a comment (EnjunDu/DSVC#1) Hi All three datasets we use are consistent with those provided by RecBole. The Yelp dataset is from RecBole (not directly from SELFRec), since SELFRec does not include social network information for Yelp. You can find the dataset details in the RecBole paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 and https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511808.3557680 Thanks for considering citing our work! 您好， https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01731 这篇论文写的yelp的用户数为1,968,703，也没有社交信息，和DSVC中的45 919不一样，方便提供一下对应yelp的链接吗，我好像没有在RecBole找到 Hi, thank you very much for the careful check and for pointing this out. I have consulted with the first author. Since this work was conducted around 2023, we are unfortunately no longer able to precisely trace back the original source or download link of the Yelp dataset used at that time. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. What we can confirm is that the Yelp dataset we used does include social network information, which is why its scale (e.g., 45,919 users) differs from the Yelp dataset described in the RecBole paper you mentioned, which does not contain social data. For reproducibility, we recommend either using the Yelp data provided in our repository (which matches our experimental setup), or constructing/using another Yelp variant with social information. Thank you again for your understanding and for your interest in citing our work. Please feel free to reach out if you have further questions. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>