Skip to content

Missing in-place real rfft! interface #61

@roflmaostc

Description

@roflmaostc

Hi,

since there is a PR for rfft! in FFTW we probably should also add rfft! in AbstractFFTs?

In general in-place real-to-complex FFT seems to be supported by CuFFT as well, right?

I recall that I was discussing this somewhere with @maleadt but I can't remember exactly.

What do you think about that?

Best,

Felix

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions