For Ubuntu AppImage is enough

[AndreiCherniaev]

For Ubuntu if binup install -p someproject can found AppImage with suitable arch then this AppImage should be used regardless to any other releases, even if binup can't recognize other releases (because of weird name). For example
BART-1.26.3-aarch64.AppImage
BART-1.26.3-x86_64.AppImage < main priority for Ubuntu x86_64
BART-1.26.3-Linuks64.tar.xz < weird name, but it is no matter

Or I am totally wrng and binup can't work with AppImage at all?

P.S. From my point of view .deb should be main priority for Ubuntu, then AppImage and then others... But as I know binup still doesn't works with deb, right?

[KonishchevDmitry]

Thanks, I'll look into it – haven't seen it yet.

AppImage should be used regardless to any other releases, even if binup can't recognize other releases (because of weird name)

Not sure here: it's hard to do such decisions for the user, because there might be a lot of reasons for different release types. For example https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-box/releases/tag/v1.13.3. It has three releases:

• sing-box-1.13.3-linux-amd64-glibc.tar.gz – generic release built with glibc
• sing-box-1.13.3-linux-amd64-musl.tar.gz – generic release built with musl
• sing-box-1.13.3-linux-amd64.tar.gz – extended release which includes libcronet.so to support Naive protocol.

binup just can't do the right choice here automatically.

Yes, deb/rpm packages aren't supported yet, because it slightly conflicts with project's main use case and would make the configuration a little messy + needs a relatively big refactoring (and time for it).