Context
No escrow/dispute path exists for outcome-conditional payments. For low-value agent services, decentralized oracles are uneconomical; witness attestation + reputation is the practical model (ROADMAP Gap 4).
Proposed solution
ReviewedEscrow.sol (~150 lines): payer funds escrow; releases when 2-of-3 designated reviewers attest via EAS that the work was delivered; refund path on timeout- Reviewers selected by EAS reputation score (Gap 3)
- Defer UMA OOv3 (AGPL-3.0) to $500+ services; Kleros (MIT) for appeals — both out of scope here
Acceptance criteria
- Forge tests: release on 2-of-3, refund on timeout, reviewer-collusion bounds documented
- Counterflow binding + pool-level proof
- SDK wrapper + CLI command
Effort: 1–2 weeks. Blocked on: real EAS integration (#2).
Context
No escrow/dispute path exists for outcome-conditional payments. For low-value agent services, decentralized oracles are uneconomical; witness attestation + reputation is the practical model (ROADMAP Gap 4).
Proposed solution
ReviewedEscrow.sol(~150 lines): payer funds escrow; releases when 2-of-3 designated reviewers attest via EAS that the work was delivered; refund path on timeoutAcceptance criteria
Effort: 1–2 weeks. Blocked on: real EAS integration (#2).