Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Indeed, we have many similarities, but we are not trying to compete; we are integrating with Lola the vision we have from a broader stack of integration with agents aligned with our ideas for security and AI sovereignty. We started to work on some ADRs that modularize the project better, and soon, it will be possible to notice the difference in our goals better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello!
I was reading the docs and found out about APM, by microsoft (didn't know it before).
Unlike the other tools in the comparision table, it's not clear to me how different lola differs from APM in term of goals. The table shows it has almost completely feature-parity, with a few expections such as "autonomous agent roadmap" and package-level hooks as experimental in APM. However, these feature gaps doesn't seems to constitute a fundamentally different direction than the one from lola. I'm not advocating for APM (as I said, I didn't even know it), I am just trying to learn (and decide what should I use!).
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions