The office of research wants a query and report of the publications produced by faculty members for a given time frame. For this project, we’re focusing on HCRI and 2020 publications. In order to capture and track publications for the next annual review cycle for Harper Cancer Research Institute (HCRI). We’re looking at publications in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. One challenge is disambiguation, we need to process a larger set of publications that might include the set of publications for our faculty researchers. The plan is to continue to use CrossRef and DOI resolvers to augment the publication information. For each publication we need to establish a confidence rating, a higher rating means that the publication is more likely to be from one of our faculty members.
We then need library members to review these publications to verify that they are in fact written by HCRI faculty.
Once a publication is reviewed, it is either added to the report or excluded from the reports. This task to queue up publications in the administrative application for review.
A checklist below outlines the concrete steps to harvest prepare publications for review. The process also includes updating the member list of the center to include new researchers as well as remove ones that are no longer members of the center. The process outlined below describes how the harvest is first performed and tested in a dev environment. A re-fetch of data is not performed in the pilot environment and the csv files created in dev are utilized to push metadata into the pilot environment for review by library employees.
The office of research wants a query and report of the publications produced by faculty members for a given time frame. For this project, we’re focusing on HCRI and 2020 publications. In order to capture and track publications for the next annual review cycle for Harper Cancer Research Institute (HCRI). We’re looking at publications in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. One challenge is disambiguation, we need to process a larger set of publications that might include the set of publications for our faculty researchers. The plan is to continue to use CrossRef and DOI resolvers to augment the publication information. For each publication we need to establish a confidence rating, a higher rating means that the publication is more likely to be from one of our faculty members.
We then need library members to review these publications to verify that they are in fact written by HCRI faculty.
Once a publication is reviewed, it is either added to the report or excluded from the reports. This task to queue up publications in the administrative application for review.
A checklist below outlines the concrete steps to harvest prepare publications for review. The process also includes updating the member list of the center to include new researchers as well as remove ones that are no longer members of the center. The process outlined below describes how the harvest is first performed and tested in a dev environment. A re-fetch of data is not performed in the pilot environment and the csv files created in dev are utilized to push metadata into the pilot environment for review by library employees.