Summary
Replace the rectangular channel cross-section used for the hydraulics with a
realistic tapered (Parker, 1978) stable-bank section. This is the physically
consistent endpoint of the narrow-channel thread: it dissolves the b/h = 2
rectangular artifact into a smooth taper, carries the bed/bank shear partition
natively, and makes the ε(b/h) taper of #21 fall out of the
geometry rather than being imposed.
The inconsistency to fix
The 2019 model borrows Parker's width closure (derived for a self-formed
channel with mobile, at-threshold banks) but uses a rectangular section for the
hydraulics (Q = u·b·h, R_h = b·h/(b+2h)). That pairing is internally
inconsistent: it is harmless when wide (banks a thin fraction of the perimeter) but
glaring as b/h → 2, where a rectangular half-pipe has near-uniform boundary shear
and therefore cannot hold same-gravel banks at threshold beneath a mobile bed.
A real self-formed channel is not rectangular.
The physical geometry
Parker's (1978) self-formed section: the banks curve/taper so the local
boundary shear equals τ*_c everywhere along them (marginally stable), while the
central bed sits at (1+ε)·τ*_c and transports; depth tapers to zero at the
margins. The mobile-bed width, R_h, and transport all follow from this shape.
The bank-stability constraint sacrifices hydraulic efficiency — it forbids the
efficient half-pipe precisely because uniform shear cannot keep same-gravel banks
stable under a mobile bed.
Approach
Payoff
Scope / cost
Longer-term research. Turning the section into a shape reaches into cross-section
geometry beyond the width B, and interacts with the dynamic-B work (#19). Likely
warrants a tractable proxy first (trapezoid/parabola) before Parker's full profile.
Related
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary
Replace the rectangular channel cross-section used for the hydraulics with a
realistic tapered (Parker, 1978) stable-bank section. This is the physically
consistent endpoint of the narrow-channel thread: it dissolves the
b/h = 2rectangular artifact into a smooth taper, carries the bed/bank shear partition
natively, and makes the
ε(b/h)taper of #21 fall out of thegeometry rather than being imposed.
The inconsistency to fix
The 2019 model borrows Parker's width closure (derived for a self-formed
channel with mobile, at-threshold banks) but uses a rectangular section for the
hydraulics (
Q = u·b·h,R_h = b·h/(b+2h)). That pairing is internallyinconsistent: it is harmless when wide (banks a thin fraction of the perimeter) but
glaring as
b/h → 2, where a rectangular half-pipe has near-uniform boundary shearand therefore cannot hold same-gravel banks at threshold beneath a mobile bed.
A real self-formed channel is not rectangular.
The physical geometry
Parker's (1978) self-formed section: the banks curve/taper so the local
boundary shear equals
τ*_ceverywhere along them (marginally stable), while thecentral bed sits at
(1+ε)·τ*_cand transports; depth tapers to zero at themargins. The mobile-bed width,
R_h, and transport all follow from this shape.The bank-stability constraint sacrifices hydraulic efficiency — it forbids the
efficient half-pipe precisely because uniform shear cannot keep same-gravel banks
stable under a mobile bed.
Approach
or Parker's cosine-type shape), as the cross-section.
R_h, mobile-bed width, and transport from the shape; the sectionbecomes a shape problem, not just a width
b.the Hydraulic-radius correction to the equilibrium-width transport law (+ competence-limited self-arrest) #20 cofactor in the wide regime.
Payoff
b/h = 2artifact — the mobilebed tapers smoothly to zero as forcing weakens (the "geometric taper toward
0 driven by the Parker criterion").
limitation").
ε(b/h)(Aspect-ratio-dependent excess shear: ε(b/h) tapering the multiplier 1.2 → 1 (bank-stability closure) #21) emerges from the geometry ratherthan being fit.
Scope / cost
Longer-term research. Turning the section into a shape reaches into cross-section
geometry beyond the width
B, and interacts with the dynamic-Bwork (#19). Likelywarrants a tractable proxy first (trapezoid/parabola) before Parker's full profile.
Related
b/h=2floor and bed/bank"Known limitation" are what this dissolves.
ε(b/h)stress-multiplier taper (the rectangular-framework near-termversion; this issue is the geometry it approximates).
B(x,t).🤖 Generated with Claude Code