Skip to content

Realistic hydraulic geometry: Parker's tapered stable-bank cross-section (beyond rectangular) #22

Description

@awickert

Summary

Replace the rectangular channel cross-section used for the hydraulics with a
realistic tapered (Parker, 1978) stable-bank section. This is the physically
consistent endpoint of the narrow-channel thread: it dissolves the b/h = 2
rectangular artifact into a smooth taper, carries the bed/bank shear partition
natively, and makes the ε(b/h) taper of #21 fall out of the
geometry
rather than being imposed.

The inconsistency to fix

The 2019 model borrows Parker's width closure (derived for a self-formed
channel with mobile, at-threshold banks) but uses a rectangular section for the
hydraulics (Q = u·b·h, R_h = b·h/(b+2h)). That pairing is internally
inconsistent: it is harmless when wide (banks a thin fraction of the perimeter) but
glaring as b/h → 2, where a rectangular half-pipe has near-uniform boundary shear
and therefore cannot hold same-gravel banks at threshold beneath a mobile bed.
A real self-formed channel is not rectangular.

The physical geometry

Parker's (1978) self-formed section: the banks curve/taper so the local
boundary shear equals τ*_c everywhere along them (marginally stable), while the
central bed sits at (1+ε)·τ*_c and transports; depth tapers to zero at the
margins. The mobile-bed width, R_h, and transport all follow from this shape.
The bank-stability constraint sacrifices hydraulic efficiency — it forbids the
efficient half-pipe precisely because uniform shear cannot keep same-gravel banks
stable under a mobile bed.

Approach

Payoff

Scope / cost

Longer-term research. Turning the section into a shape reaches into cross-section
geometry beyond the width B, and interacts with the dynamic-B work (#19). Likely
warrants a tractable proxy first (trapezoid/parabola) before Parker's full profile.

Related

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions