Integer Safety in Fee Basis Points Calculations

[Cybermaxi7]

Theme: Part 8: Hardened Security

• Context: Rounding errors or overflows in fee calculations can drain funds.
• Acceptance Criteria:

[nekwasar]

@nekwasar has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 4th wave.

I would love to work on this issue. Please can you assign it to me

ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @nekwasar to this issue.

[drips-wave]

Congratulations, @nekwasar! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on April 29, 2026.

🧑‍💻 @nekwasar: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

Warning

When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

[drips-wave]

This issue has been marked as completed by a Drips Wave moderator for @nekwasar as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 4th Wave 🥳

Moderator's reason: [Auto-assessed] The PR #197 has been merged and directly addresses the security concerns in issue #164 by implementing saturating arithmetic and safe fee calculation logic. The contributor also included a comprehensive test suite and detailed documentation for the changes.

😎 @nekwasar: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! After the current Wave ends, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here.

🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.

ℹ️ Note: This issue was marked complete via moderation. Points were issued even though the GitHub issue remains open.