User Story
As a Nucleus operator, I want configuration storage consolidated so that we do not require a separate S3 bucket for every PDS node.
Problem
Nucleus currently provisions one configuration bucket per node. The configuration data does not appear to require node-level bucket isolation, and this pattern creates unnecessary bucket sprawl and operational overhead as additional nodes and deployments are added.
Desired Outcome
Evaluate and implement a simpler configuration storage model, preferably using a shared Nucleus configuration bucket with node-specific prefixes, unless there is a technical or security requirement that necessitates separate buckets.
For example:
nucleus-config/
atm/
geo/
img/
ppi/
sbn/
...
Acceptance Criteria
User Story
As a Nucleus operator, I want configuration storage consolidated so that we do not require a separate S3 bucket for every PDS node.
Problem
Nucleus currently provisions one configuration bucket per node. The configuration data does not appear to require node-level bucket isolation, and this pattern creates unnecessary bucket sprawl and operational overhead as additional nodes and deployments are added.
Desired Outcome
Evaluate and implement a simpler configuration storage model, preferably using a shared Nucleus configuration bucket with node-specific prefixes, unless there is a technical or security requirement that necessitates separate buckets.
For example:
Acceptance Criteria