PHIPO_EXT terms should be not be used as primary annotations

[jseager7]

I've noticed that several curation sessions are using terms from the PHIPO_EXT ontology as primary terms gene-for-gene phenotype annotations.

This is not the intended usage of the ontology: the PHIPO_EXT terms are supposed to be used in the gene_for_gene_interaction annotation extension, and the primary annotation term is supposed to be a PHIPO term.

The affected publications are:

• PMID:26714171
• PMID:22102810
• PMID:25424308
• PMID:37177781

I've updated my pipeline to cope with annotations that use PHIPO_EXT as primary terms, but these annotations are not being displayed properly in PHI-base 5. For example:

For contrast, here is an example of an annotation from a curation session (PMID:25644479) that is using the PHIPO_EXT term as an annotation extension, as intended:

---

@Hsinyugithub Please can you fix these sessions, or explain why the PHIPO_EXT terms have been used in this way?

[Hsinyugithub]

Thanks for the feedback. I will have a look. They might be my ealier curations. It wasn't clear at the time if PHIPO_EXT terms can be used for this purpose.