Skip to content

Possible alignment with phenotypes from other ontologies? #388

@miseminger

Description

@miseminger

Hello,

I’m using PHIPO for describing phenotypes correlated with SARS-CoV-2 mutations. I’ve run across a few (4-5) cases where a phenotype I’m looking for doesn’t exist in PHIPO yet, but can be found in another ontology, and I’m wondering about the preferred way to resolve these cases.

For example, a certain mutation in SARS-COV-2 is correlated with increased viral gene expression. “Gene expression phenotype” is already a term in the Ontology of Microbial Phenotypes that might also fit under “single species phenotype” in PHIPO.

A second example is that a certain mutation in SARS-COV-2 is correlated with increased viral load in some host tissue, compared to wild type. “Altered viral load” might be a “pathogen-host interaction phenotype”. “Viral load” is a term in VIDO, as a subclass of “quality”.

What is the preferred way to sort this out? Is it all right to suggest merging terms from other ontologies into PHIPO in GitHub issues? Or, would it be better to suggest brand new PHIPO terms, or to just use terms from each ontology separately without trying to align them?

Thank you,

Madeline Iseminger
MSc. student
Centre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health
Simon Fraser University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-891X

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions