Skip to content

SIT-002: improve authoring ergonomics, examples, repair tools, and diagnostics #14

@jmrpineda

Description

@jmrpineda

Reported by: codex
Priority: P2
Affected surfaces: workflow authoring ergonomics, generated examples, repair tooling, operator diagnostics
Risks if postponed: authoring friction remains high, examples age badly, and repair or diagnosis work stays more manual than necessary

Summary

Reduce authoring friction by improving the structural quality of examples, repair tools, and diagnostics that support users when creating or fixing workflows.

Current pain

The roadmap still groups ergonomics, examples, repair tooling, and diagnostics as ongoing investment rather than completed infrastructure. That suggests users and agents still face avoidable friction when authoring or repairing workflows.

Why now

These surfaces compound across every new workflow and every support interaction. Incremental improvements here reduce repeated effort more effectively than isolated feature work.

Target improvement

Move common authoring and repair paths toward clearer examples, more actionable diagnostics, and tooling that resolves routine workflow issues with less manual intervention.

Non-goals

This item should not expand into a visual editor project by itself.

Validation notes

We should see lower friction in authoring flows, better repair outcomes, and clearer diagnostics for common workflow mistakes.

Notes

  • Source: local roadmap at .doc/positioning-and-roadmap.md.
  • This issue was created while migrating local backlog ownership to GitHub.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    priority:P2Normal priorityroadmapTracked from local roadmaptechnical-debtStructural improvements and maintainability work

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions