Skip to content

Adjacency Imp/Reqs bug? Look into it #60

@Fapingvin123

Description

@Fapingvin123

basically what bananique complained about,
reproducable: have an improvement that is polib_native(?) and has a resource for both adjacency improvement and requirement. May be polib bug

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions