Skip to content

workflow_state.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
59 lines (48 loc) · 3.23 KB

workflow_state.md

File metadata and controls

59 lines (48 loc) · 3.23 KB
Raw

Workflow State

PHASE

  • 6 (Finalize / handoff)

Context Summary

  • W2-02b: Outcome persistence to PacketStore — record_outcome() method integrated, handler wiring added, 16 unit tests deployed.
  • Previous: GMP-130 L9 Contract Enforcement System, template-tagged audit harness.

Active TODO Plan

  1. Wire make audit into local/dev workflow.
  2. Decide whether to fail audits on MEDIUM severity.
  3. Decide whether to commit generated artifacts/ outputs.
  4. Configure branch protection for contract-files, contract-scan, lint, test (optional).

Files in Scope

  • engine/packet/packet_store.py — record_outcome() method + SQL
  • engine/handlers.py — W2-02b outcome persistence wiring
  • engine/config/settings.py — outcome_persistence_enabled flag
  • tests/unit/test_packet_store_outcome.py — 16 unit tests
  • .env, .env.template — OUTCOME_PERSISTENCE_ENABLED=true

Test Status

  • python3 -m py_compile all modified files ✅
  • ruff check --select=E,F ✅
  • mypy ✅
  • Pre-commit hooks pass ✅

Recent Changes

  • [2026-04-26] [W2-02b] Files: engine/packet/packet_store.py, engine/handlers.py, engine/config/settings.py, tests/unit/test_packet_store_outcome.py, .env, .env.template | Action: Integrated outcome persistence via /harvest — record_outcome() method, handler wiring, feature flag, 16 unit tests | Tests: py_compile ✅, ruff ✅, mypy ✅
  • [2026-03-01] [GMP-130] Files: tools/contract_scanner.py, tools/verify_contracts.py, .pre-commit-config.yaml, .github/workflows/contracts.yml, .coderabbit.yaml, CLAUDE.md | Action: L9 Contract Enforcement System — 20 contracts enforced via pre-commit + CI + CodeRabbit | Tests: verify_contracts ✅, contract_scanner ✅, py_compile ✅
  • [2026-03-01] [PHASE 2->6] Files: tools/l9_template_manifest.yaml, tools/audit_rules.yaml, tools/audit_engine.py, scripts/audit.sh, .github/workflows/audit.yml | Action: Harvested new template-tagged audit harness files via sed-only workflow; no rewrites | Tests: syntax and YAML parse pass

Decision Log

  • Template identification is canonicalized in tools/l9_template_manifest.yaml via tag: "L9_TEMPLATE" and per-file tags metadata.
  • Audit metadata includes meta.L9_TEMPLATE: true in tools/audit_rules.yaml.

Open Questions

  • Should MEDIUM findings fail CI or remain advisory?
  • Should artifacts/ outputs be committed or ignored?

Next Steps

  1. Run integration tests for outcome persistence with PACKET_STORE_ENABLED=true.
  2. Test feedback loop end-to-end: match → outcome → PacketStore linkage.
  3. Review remaining packs in current work/04-25-2026/CEG/ for additional extraction candidates.

Recent Sessions (7-day window)

  • ✅ 2026-04-26: W2-02b Outcome Persistence — gap analysis on CEG-Graph Engine pack, extracted record_outcome() + 16 tests via /harvest, added handler wiring + feature flag, deleted historical PR audit docs.
  • ✅ 2026-04-26: Quick analysis session — confirmed DomainSpec is NOT superseded (Contract 12 source of truth, 42+ consumers, no replacement candidate). PacketEnvelope→transportPacket supersession is a separate concern.