Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
|
Seems to me that's alphabetical order. But yeah a manual override would help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It might be better if all the base hashes were automatically listed first, followed by the patches. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think us implementing this feature might be an admission that our software can't figure out what matters to the user. It also passes work onto every developer/maintainer of every set - forever. My perception is the problem is that every hash on the page looks the same. Things are being rendered as peers even though they're not peers. The back-end itself already knows this, but we're not yet leveraging it on the page. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, developers cannot reorder the hashes on the Hash Management page. Hashes are listed in alphabetical order, but often times the most commonly used hash is buried somewhere in the middle. I think it would make sense to have a way for devs to manually reorder the hash listing to put the most likely to be used hashes at the top.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions