CopperSpice removed all internal documentation in their code

[ghost]

copperspice/copperspice@44a9e9c

copperspice/copperspice@e5a959d

copperspice/copperspice@548ac8f

copperspice/copperspice@b38b85a

copperspice/copperspice@2247c0e

copperspice/copperspice@dd1c90c

[RolandHughes]

That should really help developers attempting to contribute . . . NOT!

I really don't care what they do. We are on a different road. This is about creating the application framework I've needed for every embedded system/medical device project I've ever worked on. It is also about dramatically easing the FDA 510K process.

/*!
 * \brief MessageSubscriber::MessageSubscriber
 * \param messageIds: The set of message IDs to subscribe to
 * \param parent: the parent object
 * Constructs the MessageSubsriber
 */

/*!
 * \brief VirtualKeyboard::withinLimits
 * \param tstString     String to be tested against limits
 * \returns bool        true if string is within limits and false if not
 *
 * Test string against maximum allowed length.
 */

Comments like that need to exist for every class, method, stand alone function, and constant. That stage will happen after we get Servo implemented and before we go further down the roadmap.

I'm not interested in maintaining backward compatibility with CopperSpice or continuing to be "just like CopperSpice" or viewed as "tweaked CopperSpice." This package will have massive architectural changes for the world in which I live.