Purpose
Define the ontology and SHACL surface for the Fraud Decision Intelligence capability family.
Upstream doctrine anchor:
SocioProphet/ProCybernetica:docs/capabilities/fraud-decision-intelligence-control-plane.md
Minimum vocabulary
Define canonical classes/properties for:
FraudEvent;
FraudEntity;
FraudRelationship;
FraudEvidenceBundle;
FraudDecisionReceipt;
FraudLabelProvenance;
FraudFeatureHealth;
FraudScenarioCandidate;
FraudControlAction;
FraudOutcome;
ResidualFraudLift;
FalsePositiveCluster;
FraudRingHypothesis.
Required distinctions
The ontology should distinguish:
- risk signal vs proof;
- scenario candidate vs confirmed typology;
- graph relationship vs attribution/intent;
- observed fraud vs residual fraud;
- weak label vs confirmed label;
- public-synthetic evidence vs private customer evidence;
- model recommendation vs policy-authorized control action.
Acceptance criteria
- RDF/OWL vocabulary lands under the existing ontology structure.
- SHACL shapes reject model-score-as-proof patterns.
- SHACL shapes require label provenance for confirmed fraud labels.
- SHACL shapes distinguish recommendation from authorized action.
- Public-synthetic examples do not include private customer data.
- Documentation states Ontogenesis owns ontology semantics, not runtime scoring or enforcement.
Purpose
Define the ontology and SHACL surface for the Fraud Decision Intelligence capability family.
Upstream doctrine anchor:
SocioProphet/ProCybernetica:docs/capabilities/fraud-decision-intelligence-control-plane.mdMinimum vocabulary
Define canonical classes/properties for:
FraudEvent;FraudEntity;FraudRelationship;FraudEvidenceBundle;FraudDecisionReceipt;FraudLabelProvenance;FraudFeatureHealth;FraudScenarioCandidate;FraudControlAction;FraudOutcome;ResidualFraudLift;FalsePositiveCluster;FraudRingHypothesis.Required distinctions
The ontology should distinguish:
Acceptance criteria