Bitvm discussion thread #101
Replies: 5 comments 14 replies
-
|
I'm afraid I can't attend the TabConf event, so we can drop the #51 talk. I'll close that issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Will plan to have bitvm space for talks / panel / presentation from 9:00 am - 10:00 am, on Oct 16th. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I support the idea of 15 mins for each talk. It will give a good overview of what different teams are building using BitVM. Since you've put me last, I will try my best to not repeat what I think the previous speakers will talk about. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can we be broader in the naming of this session? The talks will encompass aspects of disputable computation beyond a single "BitVM" construction, and I would hate for possible attendees to misinterpret what "BitVM" (an unfortunately overloaded term) represents in this context. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Are there any updates on the scheduling for this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Problem
We Currently we have 5 open bitvm talk proposals. There's no clear low quality submissions, but we don't have time to do all of these talks.
details potential overlap
I want to make sure we make best use of our time and not cover the same points or topics multiple times.
I plugged each issue into chat-gippidy to find some common themes/threads between all these talk proposals and this is what I got back. (probably inaccurate to some degree, but gets us going as a starting point for a conversation).
proposal
All together with 15 minutes of buffer, this would be 1.5 hours of bitvm material.
alternative proposals
Very interested in hearing feedback and having an open discussion.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions