Skip to content

Question: intended open-source license? #3

Description

@Reemster

Hi Matt,

First of all: great project. I came across outcome-kit and it looks very close to something I’m building internally around ad performance analysis: identifying real winners, fake winners, underfed opportunities and wasted spend.

I noticed the README refers to the project as open-source, but I couldn’t find a LICENSE file in the repository.

Would you be willing to add an explicit open-source license, for example MIT or Apache-2.0? That would make it much clearer for other developers and small businesses whether they can safely study, reuse or adapt parts of the project in their own tools, while of course keeping attribution and respecting the license terms.

No pressure either way — I just wanted to ask because the project looks useful and the current wording suggests it was intended to be open-source.

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions