Commit ea636ad
committed
docs(env): add eval session setup guidance in .env.example
Code-agent A/B evaluation sessions (via mercor init.py) hand a repo
snapshot to two models that start without a .env file. init.py strips
all hidden files from the snapshot EXCEPT .env.example, .gitignore, and
.dockerignore — so whatever .env.example says is the model's only guide.
Two previous eval tasks (TASK_15112, TASK_15251) hit this exact problem
with SpokeToWork: both models assumed local Supabase couldn't run
because the .env.example didn't clearly explain the setup path. Adding
the same explicit guidance here to prevent a third repeat for
ScriptHammer payment-feature evals.
The eval-session guidance explicitly tells models:
1. How to create their .env from .env.example
2. Which fields need filling (Supabase) and which should stay empty (payment keys)
3. That the "not configured" UI path is EXPECTED and graceful (per commit
77e409d) — they should compose payment UI components and observe the
feature-flag gate, not attempt to obtain real Stripe/PayPal keys
No code changes, no secrets added, no new files. Just a clearer comment
block in the existing .env.example.1 parent 77e409d commit ea636ad
1 file changed
+22
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
151 | 151 | | |
152 | 152 | | |
153 | 153 | | |
| 154 | + | |
| 155 | + | |
| 156 | + | |
| 157 | + | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
| 161 | + | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
| 175 | + | |
154 | 176 | | |
155 | 177 | | |
156 | 178 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments