Filed by the patrol daemon (sweep: stale-docs). This finding did not meet the 0.8 confidence threshold for an autonomous fix issue; opening for deliberation instead.
Observation
File: task-family-json-transform.md | Confidence: 70%
Commit 92df3ce9 ('Fix #17: [milestone Milestone 1 ] worlds/json-transform/...') and a059270d ('end-to-end json_trans') indicate recent updates to the json-transform implementation, specifically unbreaking CI and vertical slices. The documentation task-family-json-transform.md likely describes the specification for this family; however, without corresponding doc updates (no docs: commits for this specific file), the spec description is likely out of sync with the actual implementation changes required to fix Milestone 1 and CI.
Filed by stale-docs sweep
Confidence rationale
Explicit questions for reviewers
- Is this a real gap, or a pattern the daemon is over-fitting on?
- If real, does the fix belong in this repo or a sibling?
- Is the suggested fix in the Observation section correct, or is there a simpler/safer one?
Panel or operator: reply with a Decision: block. If the finding is confirmed and a fix is agreed, close this issue with Closes #<discussion> from the fix PR — patrol will learn the confirmation pattern for its next run.
Filed by the patrol daemon (sweep: stale-docs). This finding did not meet the 0.8 confidence threshold for an autonomous fix issue; opening for deliberation instead.
Observation
File:
task-family-json-transform.md| Confidence: 70%Commit
92df3ce9('Fix #17: [milestone Milestone 1 ] worlds/json-transform/...') anda059270d('end-to-end json_trans') indicate recent updates to thejson-transformimplementation, specifically unbreaking CI and vertical slices. The documentationtask-family-json-transform.mdlikely describes the specification for this family; however, without corresponding doc updates (nodocs:commits for this specific file), the spec description is likely out of sync with the actual implementation changes required to fix Milestone 1 and CI.Filed by stale-docs sweep
Confidence rationale
Explicit questions for reviewers
Panel or operator: reply with a
Decision:block. If the finding is confirmed and a fix is agreed, close this issue withCloses #<discussion>from the fix PR — patrol will learn the confirmation pattern for its next run.