Skip to content

Validate long-short portfolio definitions against the source literature #3

Description

@Yuning598

Background

The current implementation uses direction-adjusted monthly extreme portfolios. Before treating the resulting long-minus-short series as authoritative, the construction should be checked paper by paper against the literature associated with each characteristic.

Required review

Create a characteristic-level audit table that records:

  • source paper and exact citation;
  • sorting universe and sample filters;
  • breakpoint definition and number of portfolios;
  • long and short directions;
  • equal- or value-weighting convention;
  • signal timing, lag, rebalancing frequency, and holding period;
  • return definition and treatment of missing observations.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every published characteristic in the explorer has a traceable source definition.
  • Long-minus-short direction is confirmed against the cited paper rather than inferred only from a sign field.
  • Differences between the source paper and the website implementation are documented explicitly.
  • Material discrepancies are converted into follow-up implementation tasks.
  • The methodology documentation links to the audit table and states the adopted convention.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentationquestionFurther information is requested

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions