Context
The ar SDK ships a taxonomy package with 15+ built-in action types (e.g. filesystem.file.read, system.command.execute) each with descriptions and default risk levels. The openclaw plugin has 45+ tool-to-action-type mappings in taxonomy.json.
The dashboard has no taxonomy awareness — action types are shown as raw strings with no context about what they mean or their expected risk level.
What needs to change
- Add a taxonomy reference view or section showing known action types, their descriptions, and default risk levels
- In receipt lists and detail views, provide tooltip or contextual info for known action types
- Consider grouping/filtering receipts by taxonomy category (filesystem, system, etc.)
Why
Auditors reviewing receipts need to understand what action types mean. Showing taxonomy context helps users interpret the audit trail without referring to external documentation.
Context
The ar SDK ships a taxonomy package with 15+ built-in action types (e.g.
filesystem.file.read,system.command.execute) each with descriptions and default risk levels. The openclaw plugin has 45+ tool-to-action-type mappings intaxonomy.json.The dashboard has no taxonomy awareness — action types are shown as raw strings with no context about what they mean or their expected risk level.
What needs to change
Why
Auditors reviewing receipts need to understand what action types mean. Showing taxonomy context helps users interpret the audit trail without referring to external documentation.