Skip to content

Improve test coverage for lcpctl command branches #28

@amirHdev

Description

@amirHdev

The operator CLI is useful, but some command paths still are not tested as well as they should be.

I’d like someone to add tests around the less-covered command and error branches in lcpctl.

Good targets:

  • usage/help-style branches
  • missing required flag or input cases
  • unhappy-path request handling where the command should fail cleanly
  • any small branch that is easy to cover without rewriting the command structure

Suggested files:

  • cmd/lcpctl/main.go
  • cmd/lcpctl/main_test.go

Acceptance criteria:

  • tests improve branch coverage in a meaningful way
  • command behavior stays unchanged unless there is an obvious bug
  • go test ./... passes

Notes:
This is a nice issue if you prefer user-facing code over lower-level internals.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    goPull requests that update go codegood first issueGood for newcomershelp wantedExtra attention is needed

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions