Skip to content

Design a community connector contract for SSDLC artifacts #23

Description

@arthurpanhku

Why this matters

DocSentinel becomes more valuable when it can sit naturally inside existing SSDLC workflows. Every team has different tools: GitHub/GitLab, Jira, CI scanners, SBOM generators, SAST/DAST platforms, ticketing systems, and evidence repositories.

From first principles: open-source projects scale integrations best when the core defines a stable adapter contract and the community can add connectors without touching core assessment logic.

Community help wanted

We need a public connector contract and starter adapters for common SSDLC artifacts.

Suggested scope

  • Define a minimal adapter interface for importing artifacts and exporting assessment results.
  • Add sample adapters for GitHub issues/PR context, SARIF, CycloneDX SBOM, and generic JSON evidence.
  • Document how connectors should handle secrets, rate limits, retries, and provenance metadata.
  • Add contract tests so community connectors remain compatible.
  • Keep provider-specific integrations optional and disabled by default.

Acceptance criteria

  • A connector interface and documentation exist.
  • At least one sample adapter is implemented with tests.
  • Contract tests can validate third-party adapters.
  • The design keeps secrets out of logs, reports, and committed fixtures.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area: integrationsCI/CD and external workflow integrationscommunity-readyScoped contribution ready for community collaborationenhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is neededpriority: p1Important follow-up after P0 foundations

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions