How about deref-defs?

[eval]

'eval-stepping' through a bunch of @(def x y) would directly show the value of the bounded var.
Is that something that is viable/wanted to support in this library as well?

[borkdude]

Do you mean that in the REPL you would eval @(def x y) but it would still compile to (let [x y])?

[eval]

Thanks! Will try it.

[borkdude]

You could of course also insert a comment form:

(deflet
  (def x 10)
  (comment
    x
    (tap> x))
  (inc x))

[borkdude]

or:

  (deflet
    (def x 10)
    #_(do
        x
        (tap> x))
    (inc x))

[borkdude]

And also you could just evaluate the symbol x in (def x 10) after you've def-ed x in your REPL.

[eval]

Yeah, this doesn't need any additions indeed 👍🏻