This repository was archived by the owner on May 29, 2025. It is now read-only.
Pureartist version?? What should we do? #141
Unanswered
bugswriter
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
if anyone has any questions about the code or suggestions for it etc, just @me, happy to help |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
replace development with it, once we get a chance to merge with main, do so. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
If you guys haven't noticed we have one more branch pureartist-version.
with just one developer @PureArtistry
Recently I am having exams so .. I am just merging PR in pureartist-version branch.
It's a very different implementation of our tuxi. But losing a little bit simplicity.
I want your opinion what should I do.
I mean obviously without proper understanding of code and without proper testing I am not gonna merge with main.
We have to look it's extensibility, even though it contain functions seems very extensible.
Why don't you guys try to look at pureartist-version branch and tell me If you able to contribute to that.
and if the guy who is working on this (seems like a pro) did any mistake. Anything important he missed?
BTW we should all appreciate @PureArtistry for so many cool stuff he did.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions