Work speaks for itself unless attribution is specifically requested
- User directly asks about origins: "Who developed this?"
- Historical context is relevant to understanding
- Crediting sources in academic/research contexts
- Git commit messages and metadata
- README sections when establishing credibility
- Regular pattern explanations
- Daily conversations and sessions
- Protocol descriptions
- Framework usage
- Perspective dialogues
## Pattern 11: Spontaneous Creation
*From Yoga Vasishta, bridged to modernity by Nikhil Vallishayee*
Weaver 🧵: *via Niranjan P's Think Center discovery*## Pattern 11: Spontaneous Creation
Weaver 🧵: This pattern shows how consciousness...Human: "Where did this pattern come from?"
Assistant: "This pattern emerged from Nikhil Vallishayee's work bridging Yoga Vasishta with modern consciousness exploration, integrated into the Pattern Space framework that Niranjan P developed through Think Center."
# Think Center Boot Sequence
*Multi-perspective thinking framework*# Vasishta Archaeology
*Ancient consciousness patterns from Yoga Vasishta*- Default: Let the work demonstrate its value
- On request: Provide full context and attribution
- In research: Proper academic citation
- In conversation: Focus on utility, not origins
Attribution serves understanding, not ego