Skip to content

ATTiny Attacks / USBkill Attacks #25

@NagelTuev

Description

@NagelTuev

I have played through a few attack scenarios and am absolutely delighted with the USBvalve.
However, USBvalve did not recognize a Rubber Ducky based on an ATTiny85 in the form of a Digispark Rev.3.

Unlike other Rubber Duckies I have tried, windows does not identify the Digispark as HID but as a USB input device.
USBvalve does not respond at all.

Since Attiny's are very small and very cheap, I see more potential for attack in them than in other Rubber Duckies, simple instructions can also be found very quickly.

Because USBvalve is so cheap to produce, it is the optimal tool that everyone should have.
However, I still see a problem in USBkill attacks,
I think most users will power USBvalve from a computer to check USB sticks.
So the overvoltage from the USBkill would probably still cause damage to the end device.
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I think galvanic isolation would certainly make the project too expensive and complicated.
Possibly a battery could avoid the problem, but I don't know how it reacts to the overvoltage.

I think a note "Supply USBvalve with a powerbank when testing sticks" should be the easiest way.

USBvalve is a fantastic project, thanks for the effort and sharing.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions