Skip to content

[Chore]: Resolve existing clang-tidy warnings #46

@RedBlueBird

Description

@RedBlueBird

Problem

The current clang-tidy run on the existing codebase produces 100+ warnings.

Existing code that does not satisfy clang-tidy is mixed with newer upcoming PRs that use the clang-tidy style of writing, making the code more confusing to read.

One example is the ramcoretests.cxx; original test cases are written in one style, and the newer test cases are written in clang-tidy style.

Proposal

These are pre-existing and unrelated to any recent changes, but I propose that they be addressed to make future development easier.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions