I have some triangular mesh FVCOM model output in a public icechunk that supports the UGRID conventions for unstructured grid models.
The icechunk dataset renders in gridlook (hurray!), but as colored dots, which I'm assuming means that gridlook couldn't figure out how to use the connectivity array, right?
Here the gridlook URL
And a snapshot of what this looks like:

The xugrid python package handles the UGRID conventions -- maybe an agent could just convert the UGRID logic to javascript? Or maybe the conventions have clear enough documentation that the agent could just figure it out from that!
I have some triangular mesh FVCOM model output in a public icechunk that supports the UGRID conventions for unstructured grid models.
The icechunk dataset renders in gridlook (hurray!), but as colored dots, which I'm assuming means that gridlook couldn't figure out how to use the connectivity array, right?
Here the gridlook URL
And a snapshot of what this looks like:

The xugrid python package handles the UGRID conventions -- maybe an agent could just convert the UGRID logic to javascript? Or maybe the conventions have clear enough documentation that the agent could just figure it out from that!