Hi @MilosAtz,
I'm working with dassh and I have some troubles understanding the following behavior.
In the theory manual, section 3.9, Figure 9, a corner-corner adjacency for subchannels along the duct wall is shown as possible, and it is also listed among the possible options in the same paragraph. This configuration would imply the possibility of having single-pin assemblies, which is instead not possible with the actual code. In fact, if 1 ring is designated in the input file, the following error comes out : 'DASSH... single pin assemblies not supported'.
This seems generated by the instructions at lines 244-245 of file region_rodded.py. This if statement works appropriately when using the CTD correlation for mixing, but also in accordance with the theory manual (pp. 74), it could be avoided when using the MIT correlation, which is said to be 'indipendent on the bundle size'. Is this true? Or are there any restrictions in the usage of MIT correlation also for one pin assemblies? Thanks
Hi @MilosAtz,
I'm working with dassh and I have some troubles understanding the following behavior.
In the theory manual, section 3.9, Figure 9, a corner-corner adjacency for subchannels along the duct wall is shown as possible, and it is also listed among the possible options in the same paragraph. This configuration would imply the possibility of having single-pin assemblies, which is instead not possible with the actual code. In fact, if 1 ring is designated in the input file, the following error comes out : 'DASSH... single pin assemblies not supported'.
This seems generated by the instructions at lines 244-245 of file region_rodded.py. This if statement works appropriately when using the CTD correlation for mixing, but also in accordance with the theory manual (pp. 74), it could be avoided when using the MIT correlation, which is said to be 'indipendent on the bundle size'. Is this true? Or are there any restrictions in the usage of MIT correlation also for one pin assemblies? Thanks