Hi!
Thank you for your impressive work! I am now reproducing the results of ADC on CUB200 but I cannot get similar results to those reported in the paper. For example, for T=10, I can only obtain the result of last accuracy of 41.92, which is much lower than the reported results of 51.78 in the paper.
I follow the details of implementation in supplimentary materials and the experiment setting is list below.
init_epoch = 200
init_lr = 0.01
init_milestones = [60, 120, 160]
init_lr_decay = 0.1
init_weight_decay = 0.0005
epochs = 100
lrate = 0.005
milestones = [45, 90]
lrate_decay = 0.1
batch_size = 128
weight_decay = 2e-4
num_workers = 8
T = 2
lamda = 20
Is there any problem for this setting? Did I use a wrong set of parameters? Could you please provide the detailed paramerters?
Thanks a lot!
Hi!
Thank you for your impressive work! I am now reproducing the results of ADC on CUB200 but I cannot get similar results to those reported in the paper. For example, for T=10, I can only obtain the result of last accuracy of 41.92, which is much lower than the reported results of 51.78 in the paper.
I follow the details of implementation in supplimentary materials and the experiment setting is list below.
init_epoch = 200
init_lr = 0.01
init_milestones = [60, 120, 160]
init_lr_decay = 0.1
init_weight_decay = 0.0005
epochs = 100
lrate = 0.005
milestones = [45, 90]
lrate_decay = 0.1
batch_size = 128
weight_decay = 2e-4
num_workers = 8
T = 2
lamda = 20
Is there any problem for this setting? Did I use a wrong set of parameters? Could you please provide the detailed paramerters?
Thanks a lot!