Extend weak content check for tool needs

[Aymen-Soussi-01]

Extend weak content check for tool needs and correct failed Tool requirements in the build

close: #148

[github-actions]

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //src:license-check

Status: ✅ Passed

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 78b913d7-8cb6-4f4f-b3a5-ce3e1b66e626
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (96 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (109 packages loaded, 17 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (148 packages loaded, 1598 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (158 packages loaded, 2683 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (158 packages loaded, 2687 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (162 packages loaded, 4820 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //src:license-check (163 packages loaded, 4946 targets configured).
[10 / 13] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java~/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
[11 / 13] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java~/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //src:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 18.233s, Critical Path: 2.56s
INFO: 13 processes: 1 disk cache hit, 9 internal, 2 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check src/formatted.txt -review -project automotive.score -repo https://github.com/eclipse-score/docs-as-code -token otyhZ4eaRYK1tKLNNF-Y
[main] INFO Querying Eclipse Foundation for license data for 83 items.
[main] INFO Found 58 items.
[main] INFO Querying ClearlyDefined for license data for 25 items.
[main] INFO Found 25 items.
[main] INFO Vetted license information was found for all content. No further investigation is required.

[AlexanderLanin]

Why not aou? Any other missing?

[Aymen-Soussi-01]

This is the list of the requirement we need to cover not all of them I didn't want the new tag name to be more longer or I can exclude aou also in the name: https://eclipse-score.github.io/docs-as-code/pr-140/product/requirements.html#tool_req__docs_req_weak_content

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

I did add AOU I think in my PR, as I saw it missing.
But we can double check it.

[github-actions]

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

/consumer-test

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

/consumer-test

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

This is still not quiet right.
As we want the 'requirement_excl_process' to be inside the metamodel defined not here.

Basically do not want to change python code if we want to change which needs or what words are affected.

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

This has been merged in collaboration PR #173.