Skip to content

Peer Review Week #3 #1

Description

@emench

RUBRIC:

An OSF account and project; ✅
A Zotero account;✅
Zotero library linked to OSF;✅
A *.bib file;✅
A GitHub account;✅
A welcome page Wiki on your OSF project;✅
Another wiki page that describes your bare-bones plans (serving as a mini example pre-registration);✅
Been added to the LDP Organization on GitHub;✅
A GitHub repository inside the LDP organization;✅
Finished creating necessary folders (code, data, outputs, etc) and associated _README files within your RStudio project directory;✅
Committed and pushed these changes to GitHub;✅
Connected your GitHub repo to OSF;✅
A .csl file; (find a csl file here (Links to an external site.)) and instructions on how to access and use a CSL file in your markdown document✅
An initial script (.R file) which downloads your data and uses groundhog to manage packages;✅ (optional, however)
A *.RProj file;✅
A preregistration file on OSF;✅
Created a view-only link for your OSF project and send it to your peer;✅
An *.Rmd file that will become your manuscript.✅
A .gitgnore file✅
The complete folder structure and respective files in each folder (data - raw and clean -, code, manuscript, outputs, etc. + README and LICENSE - at least)✅
Your remote repository should have branches that reflect different aspects of the development of your project (e.g., one for analysis, one for figures, one for writing…)✅
An open pull request (PR) from a development branch to your main branch, requesting a review from one of your colleagues.✅

Final Grade: 20/20

Hi Emma, great job and love the improvements from last time! I have a few nit-picky suggestions that aren't crucial, but they might be somewhat helpful. The first thing is maybe instead of the folder "manuscripts" in your github repo, you could title it something a little more descriptive since you also have your pregreg in there? Perhaps "written-outputs" or "prereg-and-manuscript"? Another thing I noticed is that there are some readme files in different formats - "_README.md" and "README". By the looks of it though, the "README" format github is able to recognize as a readme file and puts it in the description section at the bottom of each folder but I think in class we were told "_README"? So I might've missed something because I'm not sure which type to use. Maybe we can figure that out together? Another tip would be to maybe put a pdf of your pregreg actually in your OSF project files so it is easily accessible and easy to read. Otherwise looking good!! :)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions