The default formatting in the "List Description" section of a Gram Packer list puts equal vertical space before and after a section heading. This is unfortunate, as the ordinary text below a section heading isn't as easily identified with the section heading as it should be. There's a reason why few news and blog websites, for example, have equal space above and below section headings: it makes the text a bit harder to understand. This screenshot illustrates the problem:
Possible solutions
It would be easier to associate a section heading with the corresponding text if the heading and the text were grouped more closely together. In practice, this could be done by increasing the CSS margin-top value for section headings, or by decreasing the margin-bottom value.
But if adjusting the CSS is too much, it would help simply to allow users to insert extra blank lines in their List Descriptions. For example, if Gram Packer treated <br><br> as "insert two blank lines," that would help. (That is how GitHub treats <br>.)
The default formatting in the "List Description" section of a Gram Packer list puts equal vertical space before and after a section heading. This is unfortunate, as the ordinary text below a section heading isn't as easily identified with the section heading as it should be. There's a reason why few news and blog websites, for example, have equal space above and below section headings: it makes the text a bit harder to understand. This screenshot illustrates the problem:
Possible solutions
It would be easier to associate a section heading with the corresponding text if the heading and the text were grouped more closely together. In practice, this could be done by increasing the CSS
margin-topvalue for section headings, or by decreasing themargin-bottomvalue.But if adjusting the CSS is too much, it would help simply to allow users to insert extra blank lines in their List Descriptions. For example, if Gram Packer treated
<br><br>as "insert two blank lines," that would help. (That is how GitHub treats<br>.)