Why
/workflow create currently reads like a long agent transcript. Questions, internal protocol tool calls, large structured payloads, and progress information compete for attention. Users need to see the current question and the plan they are reviewing, not the mechanics used to move data between the agent and workflow engine.
What
Replace the raw creation transcript with a compact, purpose-built experience for the brief, clarification, plan review, generation, validation, and completion stages.
Description
submit_questions and submit_result are framework-owned transport tools. Their calls and acknowledgement results are needed by the engine and session history, but they are not meaningful user actions and should not appear as ordinary tool executions in the creation UI. In particular, the blueprint submitted through submit_result can produce a large wall of structured data.
The view should emphasize one active task at a time, retain enough context to understand where creation is, and keep detailed protocol data available in the underlying session/run record for diagnostics. The separate plan-display issue defines the content shown during approval; this issue owns the overall presentation and visibility of framework internals.
Acceptance criteria
Why
/workflow createcurrently reads like a long agent transcript. Questions, internal protocol tool calls, large structured payloads, and progress information compete for attention. Users need to see the current question and the plan they are reviewing, not the mechanics used to move data between the agent and workflow engine.What
Replace the raw creation transcript with a compact, purpose-built experience for the brief, clarification, plan review, generation, validation, and completion stages.
Description
submit_questionsandsubmit_resultare framework-owned transport tools. Their calls and acknowledgement results are needed by the engine and session history, but they are not meaningful user actions and should not appear as ordinary tool executions in the creation UI. In particular, the blueprint submitted throughsubmit_resultcan produce a large wall of structured data.The view should emphasize one active task at a time, retain enough context to understand where creation is, and keep detailed protocol data available in the underlying session/run record for diagnostics. The separate plan-display issue defines the content shown during approval; this issue owns the overall presentation and visibility of framework internals.
Acceptance criteria
submit_questionsandsubmit_resultcalls and acknowledgement results are hidden from the normal creation transcript.