Skip to content

Some Questions About the Data #32

Description

@idontgetoutmuch

I have downloaded the historical dataset for old faithful: http://www.geysertimes.org/archive/geysers/Old_Faithful_eruptions.tsv.gz. I am struggling to understand what some of the columns mean.

In particular, looking at the first row,

eruptionID	geyser	eruption_time_epoch	has_seconds	exact	ns	ie	E	A	wc	ini	maj	min	q	duration	entrant	observer	eruption_comment	time_updated	time_entered	associated_primaryID	other_comments	Old_Faithful_Preplay_Time_VEC	Old_Faithful_Height_VEC
23132	Old Faithful	10506540	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	4min	BoekelUpload	OFVCL-EV		1335129843	1335129843	23132	NULL	NULL	NULL

did the dataset really begin at (eruption_time_epoch):

*Main> epochToUTC 10506540
1970-05-02 14:29:00 UTC

and if so what do the time_updated and and time_entered mean?

*Main> epochToUTC 1335129843
2012-04-22 21:24:03 UTC

Perhaps the data was collected in 1970 but only added to your excellent site in 2012?

By row 86360 the consistency(?) seems to have improved

86360	Old Faithful	1310155500	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1m46s	BoekelUpload	OFVCL-EV	(160+ft)	1352243080	1352243080	86360	NULL	NULL	NULL

So the eruption_time_epoch is

*Main> epochToUTC 1310155500
2011-07-08 20:05:00 UTC

and the time_updated and time_entered are

*Main> epochToUTC 1352243080
2012-11-06 23:04:40 UTC

Also the number of missing entries for duration seem to have increased over time. Is there any reason for this?

I am trying to validate the dataset that is available in the R programming language https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/datasets/html/faithful.html which I am beginning to suspect is not representative of old faithful's actual behaviour.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions