Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 4, 2025. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 4, 2025. It is now read-only.

[Question] Is the plan to "SVGBasicWrite" to always be Basic? #82

@giuliano-macedo

Description

@giuliano-macedo

Hello! First of all, thank you for the package, I am impressed that is a breeze to create pdf documents without some intermediary format (html, markdown, latex, etc) using this package.

Question

I've tried out the method SVGBasicWrite and I noticed that it doesn't support (as "advertised" haha) some features of SVG like relative commands ( lower case commands ), and I would be happy to contribute and add this feature.

However, given that it is supposed to be a basic SVG I am unsure if this contribution would make sense in this package, therefore I have some questions:

  • Is the plan to "SVGBasicWrite" to always be Basic, or is the goal to have a full SVG support in fpdf?

if answer to above is to always be basic

  • What exactly does it count as being basic? does relative commands falls into being basic?
  • Do you guys know a package that is using fpdf that is implementing a full SVG support? if not, what does the idea of creating one sounds to you guys?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions